Re: Trig Fomula
- From: Deep <deepkdeb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:03:45 -0700
On Aug 9, 3:45 pm, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:29:47 -0500, Robert Israel
<isr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Deep <deepk...@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Any comment and reference about the correctness of the following
assertion will be appreciated.
Assertion: If (1) is valid then (2) is also valid under the given
conditions.
Tan kD = (u/v)^(1/2) (1)
Tan D = (m/n)^(1/2) (2)
Conditions: 0 < D < pi/2; u, v, m, n are integers each > 1 and none is
a pefect square; (u, v) = 1, (m, n) = 1.
Prime k > 3.
Why don't you try a few small examples before making such assertions?
I second this complaint.
However, based on many similar prior posts, I think that Deep probably
lacks the skills and technology to test such conjectures.
In any case, here's a simple counterexample ...
Let u=3,v=2, and let D be the smallest positive real number such that
tan(5D)=sqrt((3/2)). Thus, (1) is satisfied.
It's straightforward to show that tan^2(D) is a root of the equation
2*x^5-115*x^4+520*x^3-530*x^2+110*x-3 = 0
but by the rational root test, the above equation has no rational
roots. Thus (2) fails.
quasi
Yes, you are right in your assessment. Having said so I request you to
kindly identify the error in the following analysis. I have used [1]
as a reference.
[1] Hobson,E.W, A Treatise on Plane Trigonometry(1928)pp111.
Tan kD = A/B (1)
A = N1tan D - N3(tanD)^3 + N5(tan D)^5 - ... (2)
B = 1 - N2(tanD)^2 + N4(tanD)^4 - ... (3)
where N1 = k, N2, N3, ... all are divisible by k
(1) can be regarded as an equation in tan D having k roots which are
tan D, tan(D+pi/k), ... , tan(D+(k-1)pi/k)
V)^(1/2)From (1) it is seen that if tan D = (u/v)^(1/2) then tan kD = (U/
v)^(1/2)From this I assert that if tan kD = (U/V)^(1/2) then tan D = (u/
According to you, as I understand,this assertion is wrong.
I would greatly appreciate if you would kindly tell why this assertion
is not correct.
With thanks and gratitude.
Deep
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trig Fomula
- From: quasi
- Re: Trig Fomula
- References:
- Trig Fomula
- From: Deep
- Re: Trig Fomula
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Trig Fomula
- From: quasi
- Trig Fomula
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH; Its over with a simple example
- Next by Date: Re: number theory : the conjecture
- Previous by thread: Re: Trig Fomula
- Next by thread: Re: Trig Fomula
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|