Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:29:07 -0600
In article <1186879071.686632.138040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Ross A. Finlayson" <raf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There exist counterexamples in standard real analysis showing a least
positive real.
Only in the Bourbaki sense of positive. There are no examples in
standard analysis showing a least strictly positive real in any sense.
I agree that infinitesimals are possible, but unfortunately most
mathematicians will only consider standard theories.
Most mathematicians will consider systems of infinitesimals possible,
but unless their own work makes such infinitesimals useful, they are not
liable to spend much energy or time on them.
To expect them to do so is like commanding all heart surgeons to become
proficient in brain surgery, or civil engineers to become proficient in
microprocessor architecture.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: lwalke3
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- References:
- how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Calvin
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Michael Press
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Calvin
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: lwalke3
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: lwalke3
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- how to list all of the real numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: Fibre bundles vs sheaves
- Next by Date: Re: How to prove that the space of signed measures is complete?
- Previous by thread: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Next by thread: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Index(es):