Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: "Ross A. Finlayson" <raf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:35:00 -0700
On Aug 11, 7:29 pm, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1186879071.686632.138...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Ross A. Finlayson" <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There exist counterexamples in standard real analysis showing a least
positive real.
Only in the Bourbaki sense of positive. There are no examples in
standard analysis showing a least strictly positive real in any sense.
Please see "Counterexamples in Real Analysis".
Ross
--
Finlayson Consulting
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- References:
- how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Calvin
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Michael Press
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Calvin
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: lwalke3
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: lwalke3
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- From: Virgil
- how to list all of the real numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Shannon's theory of communication
- Previous by thread: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Next by thread: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading