Re: series expansion : a question
- From: neilist <littoralee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:43:31 -0000
On Aug 13, 10:45 pm, Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.sanss...@club-
internet.fr> wrote:
Gottfried Helms a écrit :
Am 14.08.2007 01:39 schrieb Denis Feldmann:
tommy1729 a écrit :
i am better at math then you areWanna bet? You are usually ridiculous
i won a math olympiad tooLiar
Wrong, and very badly so. See for instance my contributions to 4D
rotation threads with Pertti Lounesto, or my recent puszzle (I know, it
contained a lot of misprints at first, but the final expression
iscorrect, and I still bet you are not able to prove it is always real,
not mentioning how I found it. Hint : it is not so elementary as it
look, and I used a (reasonably) advanced tool to find it)
rather than to ask questions , let alone do math...
As I told you, I have been here for more than 10 years,so...
----------------------------------------------------------
Instead of getting involved into such talk (and getting
used to claims&responses concerning lies et al.) it would be
better to save energy for more constructive threads.
Absolutely right. I was tired, and bored, and a little bit angry at this
stupid troll (which, by the way , is probably not so crankish than he
sounds, just very young, and eager to show what he knows. Or maybe I am
too indulgent?) Anyway, my next contrbutions were more constructive, as
you may check :-)
I don't know, these exchanges remind me to the "black
hole" which attracts everything and consumes the
attention and energy which would be useful for constructive
discussions. It looks and feels like "discussions" with a well
designed bot (I knew "Eliza" and "Billy" for examples).
Still, if someone had designed a bot having those performaznces, he
should really use this for more constructive achievments too :-)
These "tommy" threads remind me to such "exchanges": just
coin some new keywords at any stage and get the discutant
busy. Focus at some ad-hominem aspects, and he will stick
until he's dead.
Sure
It sucks energy and leaves only burn-outs at the end.
Don't feed the troll, I'd say.
Momentary power failure; I will try not to do it again
Gottfried- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Denis, with all due respect, you must have been tired - you were
typing as sloppy as Tommy!
His influence is starting to rub off on you :-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: series expansion : a question
- From: tommy1729
- Re: series expansion : a question
- References:
- Re: series expansion : a question
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: series expansion : a question
- From: tommy1729
- Re: series expansion : a question
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: series expansion : a question
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: series expansion : a question
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: series expansion : a question
- Prev by Date: x^3+y^3=x-y --> x^2+4y^2<1 for positive x and y. Why?
- Next by Date: Re: Langlands and FLT
- Previous by thread: Re: series expansion : a question
- Next by thread: Re: series expansion : a question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|