Re: WHY DENIS IS A STUPID *** + PROVING TO ALL CRITICS MY LEVEL OF MATH

On 15 Aug, 00:04, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
denis wrote:

(and did no math whatsowever rather insulted as
usual)

> tommy1729 a écrit :
In article

<33119411.1186861057132.JavaMail.jaka...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
forum.org> tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:
> considering series expansion ..

> a power series is taylor
> an nth derivate series is taylor

You are doing things the wrong way. A Taylor
series
exists for a function
that is analytical in a circle around the
origin.
In
that case the Taylor
series is convergent within that circle. When a
Taylor series does exist
we can get the n-th derivative of it by taking
the
n-th derivative of the
terms, constructing a new Taylor series. And we
can
integrate the function
by integrating the terms (where we have to
insert
suitable constant terms).
A function for which the n-th derivative does
not
exist at x = 0 does not
have a Taylor series expansion at all. (An
example
is x^3.|x|, which has
first, second, third and fourth derivatives, but
for
which the fifth
derivative at x = 0 does not exist, so it is not
analytical in x = 0 and
so does not have a Taylor series expansion.)

> what is the analogue for an integral ??
wich series can be expressed in the nth
integral
l ??

See above. Although I do not understand the
second
question.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj
amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam,
nederland;
http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
once agian i am misunderstood ...

once again, you obfuscated issues, then complained

i understand taylor series perfectly ...
Certainly not . You are a troll. Dont expect any
further serious help
for us now.
radius of convergeance too...

thats NOT the issue here !!!
If you say so...

considering f(x+a) = f(a)+f'(a)x +...

(taylor ) it is clear that taylor is a power
series
( infinite polynomial of x )
and a series of nth derivates ( f^n(a))

i am looking for the analogue of nth integrals
...

tommy1729
Keep looking. Remember Taylor series are unique.

DUH !!!

of course taylor is unique ...

but i wasnt looking for taylor

so duh !!!

Perhaps you are looking
for something like Euler-MacLaurin smomation
formula?

no

But I strongly
doubt it. You are just trolling as usual

no you are



no , just as usual you dont understand the math i
am describing...

If you say so

i say so

and anybody who understands that your comment is irrelevant understands that too



i am better at math then you are

Wanna bet? You are usually ridiculous

no you are rediculous

could not even compute an average , remember ?



want a second opinion ??

ask quasi about my factoring tricks for instance

Quasi is not so good either.

YOU SIMPLY DID NOT LOOK AT THE FACTORING TRICKS NOW DID YOU ?????

so , you really think you are better than me ??

and even better than quasi ???

quasi , are you letting him say that ??

well if your so good , you might wanna proof my factoring tricks ...

why dont you proof or disproof all conjectures and theorems made by me and quasi ???

you cant , can you ??

And you were badly lying

on that one

or look up sequences called after me

What is your real name? I dont hide mine...

look them up under tommy1729 perhaps ??

once again , you did not do that

doesnt fit you hmm ?



i won a math olympiad too

Liar

i have at least one operator and two constants
named after me
Liar (you dont even jknow what is an operator, by the
way)

you havent looked that up hmm ???

here is one

(on the on-line encyclopedia of integer sequences)

id:A102575 (on tetration , number proven irrational)

( can you prove it's irrationality ?? )

or more if you like:

A096436 (prime representation theory)
A111129 (continued fractions theory)

certain proof of the universality of certain classes of differental equations and cellular automata

helping to write math software

coaching students

...

you remind me of bit188

you have a lot of nerve for a newbie...

I was here since 1997 (where were yopu), not to
mention my carreer in
the real world

i was doing math ...

and i was here , under another name perhaps ??

did not think of that hmm ??

only looked at the number of posts hmm ??

well then since you only have 91 posts , so by your own logic , i have been here much longer, since i have more posts

HA!!



you dont even know about the math i have done in
the past

you were not even here ...

and i guess you were not present at the math
olympiad either ...

They were not created when I was a student.

yeah right

perfect excuse !!

But I won





a few distinctions
in my time.

it is YOU WHO HAS TO CONVINCE US THAT YOU ARE NOT A
TROLL

SINCE YOU ONLY INSULT PEOPLE HERE

Wrong, and very badly so. See for instance my
contributions to 4D
rotation threads with Pertti Lounesto, or my recent
puszzle (I know, it
contained a lot of misprints at first, but the final
expression
iscorrect, and I still bet you are not able to prove
it is always real,
not mentioning how I found it. Hint : it is not so
elementary as it
look, and I used a (reasonably) advanced tool to find
it)

rather than to ask questions , let alone do math...

i have seen lots of critics towards me ...

the only reason you can react like that is because
this forum is unmoderated !!

NOT because you are a genius...

you could not even compute an average remember ???

now what kind of mathematician cant compute an
average

Poor iiot.

your the idiot

You never eve,n try to understand quasi

answer,

lol , i understand quasi

and quasi understands my posts

whereas you dont

yet you claim to be smarter than the both of us

HA !!

or to realize

your conjecture was doomed beyond repair...

yet not as bad as not being able to compute an average hmm





;

yet claims to understand calculus ??

denis and denis only ...

there is a pattern in critics towards me

1) they insult me

2) they dont do math

3) they leave , realising they misjudged me ,
and/or they cant do math...

(usually both)

your faith will be the same as bit188...
(or any other)

she considered me a crank too...

till some people here pointed out the level of my
postings*

*Name one posting not low level.

( especially the ones she did not read )

she refused to read them...

finally she apologized

promised to do some math

and then left ...

and time will repeat itself ...

notice how most people on my cranklist have left

they were all critics of mine ...

and those are only the recent ones ...

so they all had to go ...

realizing they made a fool out of themselves
doubting me ...

You are a liar and a troll.

go ahead

look for my factoring tricks ...

ask quasi about it if you dont believe me ...

dont expect JSH type factoring tricks , mine are
much more advanced !!!

go ahead , look it up

or ask quasi

or ask timothy golden

or ask neilist

or even robert israel will remember that

ill let you in on a little secret here

robert isreal is a good mathematician

and he worked on tetration

( a word you probably never heard of )

so plz dont make a fool of yourself claiming

your a better mathematician then him...

im way to friendly to warn you for this actually ...



You lie. Anyway, why do you never give any reference?

i just did hahaha



or do you consider those guys cranks too ??

time will repeat itself...

you probably think this does not apply to you ;
that your different ...

think again ...

As I told you, I have been here for more than 10
years,so...

i was here before under other names

so what ?



i dare you to prove/disproof all of mine or quasi's conjectures and theorems

ha !

------------------------------------------------------
----

"dimensionality is resolved !! "
tommy1729 about perelmanns proof

btw 1729 is the taxicab number if you might wonder about that.

In Leisure suit Larry in the land of the lounge Wizards?


Riemann Matiyasevich and Wiles forever
tommy1729- Dölj citerad text -

- Visa citerad text -- Dölj citerad text -

- Visa citerad text -- Dölj citerad text -

- Visa citerad text -


.