Re: Pattern Possibilities
- From: inkexit@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:44:44 -0700
Hmm, why did this reply appear before my previous one,
with the correct answer? In case it doesn't (because Google
ate it), the correct answer to the question posed is
65**95
I don't understand this notation. Or did you mean 65^95?
Thanks for the answer.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pattern Possibilities
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Pattern Possibilities
- References:
- Pattern Possibilities
- From: inkexit
- Re: Pattern Possibilities
- From: [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
- Re: Pattern Possibilities
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Pattern Possibilities
- Prev by Date: Re: Pattern Possibilities
- Next by Date: Re: Explain Green's Theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Pattern Possibilities
- Next by thread: Re: Pattern Possibilities
- Index(es):
