Re: Another Inconvenient Truth

From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:15:11 +0200

David R Tribble wrote:

...and mathematicians were still able to work with numbers without
using set theory. Some of them haven't even bothered to learn set
theory.

Hey! This is kind of new for me. Please name me some mathematicians who
"haven't even bothered to learn set theory". I'm eager to meet them!

Han de Bruijn

.

References:
- Another Inconvenient Truth
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
  - From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
  - From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
  - From: Han de Bruijn

Prev by Date: Re: Legal Complaints against sci.math?
Next by Date: Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
Previous by thread: Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
Next by thread: Re: Another Inconvenient Truth
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: tommy set theory / cantor simplified and corrected
... David C. Ullrich. ... and your " disproof " of my set theory is bogus ... but you dont read explainations hmm? ... how come nobody agrees on your "disproof" (lol) ...
(sci.math)
Re: tommy set theory / cantor simplified and corrected
... David C. Ullrich. ... wiki for it ULLRICH HAHAHA ... and your " disproof " of my set theory is bogus ... others accepted it because of dedekind cuts ...
(sci.math)
Re: tommy set theory / cantor simplified and corrected
... David C. Ullrich. ... wiki for it ULLRICH HAHAHA ... Aatu is making fun of you ... and your " disproof " of my set theory is bogus as ...
(sci.math)
Re: Line does not consist of points..
... its just set theory in full glory. ... david himself agreed there is no problem with line only exists out of points. ... and neither with an uncountable sum. ... not to fake amys tommys or whoever you also claim to be. ...
(sci.math)
Re: question about axiomatic set theory
... >> David C. Ullrich wrote: ... Maybe it's more accurate to say that not much set theory is ... >I think what David meant was that you don't need that much set theory to ... >non-standard models. ...
(sci.math)