Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Mitch <maharri@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:34:21 -0000
On Aug 17, 9:53 am, "Pummelo" <pumm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"G. A. Edgar" <ed...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The algorithm "make the truth table" takes too long.
The problem "satisfiability" is NP complete.
If P <> NP, then every algorithm (not only that one) takes too long.
So I don't understand your point. You mean "because every algorithm consumes
too much time to be practical [which is certainly untrue, by the way]
certainly untrue? if P <> NP? what's your example algorithm for
satisfiability that does not consume too much time to be practical in
all instances?
than there are no reasons to bother with proof systems", right ?
I had trouble figuring out the direction of what you meant by this
with the context of the previous sentence. Without context, there are
very good reasons to bother with proof systems, namely, because
valuations (truth-table arguments) are inefficient.
Mitch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Pummelo
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- References:
- why not just publish truth table?
- From: narutocanada@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Pummelo
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Pummelo
- why not just publish truth table?
- Prev by Date: Re: "kernel" of a monoid homomorphism
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Factoring integers, more analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: why not just publish truth table?
- Next by thread: Re: why not just publish truth table?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|