Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: "Pummelo" <pummelo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:12:26 +0200
"Mitch" <maharri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
consumesThe algorithm "make the truth table" takes too long.
The problem "satisfiability" is NP complete.
If P <> NP, then every algorithm (not only that one) takes too long.
So I don't understand your point. You mean "because every algorithm
too much time to be practical [which is certainly untrue, by the way]
certainly untrue? if P <> NP? what's your example algorithm for
satisfiability that does not consume too much time to be practical in
all instances?
Have I said something like this ? An algorithm is practical if it is
practical for practical problems. There are a lot of SAT solvers (even
REAL-TIME solvers) designed for particular tasks and performing well.
Start here:
http://www.satlive.org/
than there are no reasons to bother with proof systems", right ?
I had trouble figuring out the direction of what you meant by this
with the context of the previous sentence.
I'm trying to understand G. A. Edgar's logic.
mp
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Mitch
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- References:
- why not just publish truth table?
- From: narutocanada@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Pummelo
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: G. A. Edgar
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Pummelo
- Re: why not just publish truth table?
- From: Mitch
- why not just publish truth table?
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Factoring integers, more analysis
- Next by Date: Re: "Central term" (median) for a very very large set of numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: why not just publish truth table?
- Next by thread: Re: why not just publish truth table?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|