Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:14:55 -0000
On Aug 20, 6:04 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 20, 4:31 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Your delusions are off-topic for sci.physics. GTFO.
Actually the subject of random is very important in physics, and it
turns out that it's a good exercise to play with statistical tools and
p mod 3, so I'm on topic.
You are not.
I like this route because p mod 3 is so short while it can take a
while to plug everything in, and better yet, watch the math people
start jumping around and acting like crazed freaks when you challenge
them with the results.
I figure, they'll try to talk rational at first, then get increasingly
defensive and then turn to insults, finishing up with claiming that
physics people just don't know math.
And they'll try to walk away at that point and not face any
consequences, I'd guess.
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: rossum
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: Rotwang
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: William Hughes
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- References:
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- Prev by Date: 'Evenly' distribute a set of points across the face and perimeter of a circle.
- Next by Date: Re: Stone/Boolean space that is extremally disconnected and is door.
- Previous by thread: Re: About random, primes and statistics
- Next by thread: Re: About random, primes and statistics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|