Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:28:02 -0700
On Aug 20, 9:14 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 20, 6:04 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 20, 4:31 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Your delusions are off-topic for sci.physics. GTFO.
Actually the subject of random is very important in physics, and it
turns out that it's a good exercise to play with statistical tools and
p mod 3, so I'm on topic.
You are not.
I like this route because p mod 3 is so short while it can take a
while to plug everything in, and better yet, watch the math people
start jumping around and acting like crazed freaks when you challenge
them with the results.
I figure, they'll try to talk rational at first, then get increasingly
defensive and then turn to insults, finishing up with claiming that
physics people just don't know math.
And they'll try to walk away at that point and not face any
consequences, I'd guess.
James Harris
I predicit you will ignore simple demonstrations that the
sequence is not random, and demand instead that people explain
to you why it is not random.
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: David Bernier
- Re: JSH: About random, primes and statistics
- From: Tim Peters
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- References:
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- From: JSH
- Re: About random, primes and statistics
- Prev by Date: Re: Stone/Boolean space that is extremally disconnected and is door.
- Next by Date: Re: 'Evenly' distribute a set of points across the face and perimeter of a circle.
- Previous by thread: Re: About random, primes and statistics
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: About random, primes and statistics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|