Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:39:18 -0700
On Aug 20, 6:32 pm, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
william hughes wrote :
On Aug 20, 5:15 pm, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
professor ullrich ??????
he has NEVER HEARD OF 2^aleph_0 >= aleph_1
Piffle. He is well aware of the inequality.
However, you did not claim an inequality, you
claimed that the *equality*
2^aleph_0 = aleph_1
is true (if you doubt this look at your original
post).
No comment?
- William Hughes
.
- References:
- Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- From: William Hughes
- Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- From: tommy1729
- Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- Prev by Date: Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: About random, primes and statistics
- Previous by thread: Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- Next by thread: Re: A CHALLANGE TO CANTORIANS
- Index(es):