Re: May be a short history of JSH? No offense.

On Aug 20, 6:01 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 19, 10:00 pm, Gvnaena Pura <tianran.c...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The short background was very nice, just a few more questions:

1) Insults aside, is SWJPAM the only major incident here?

Hey that's big enough!!! After years of claiming no mathematician in
the world believed my research was correct sci.math'ers were
confronted with publication!!!

Gee, publication, AFTER people pointed out that the final conclusion
was wrong? And you, JSH, KNEW that the result was incorrect, yet let
the paper run anyway?

That's called FRAUD in the real world. I don't know what it's called
in JSH's world. Hey, I don't know what color the sky is in JSH's
world.

They FREAKED. And some of them stepped way over the line and
convinced the journal editors of something false.

Now that journal is dead--because those editors sere stupid enough to
trust Usenet posters.

Its hosting university Cameron University, wiped all mention of it
(last time I checked in case they thought better of that) from their
websites.

ALL the authors who'd been published over nine years of its existence
would be in limbo if not for the brave efforts of EMIS as they kept
the archives up.

It's one of the wackiest stories in modern mathematics. Period.

Gets even wackier: There was a paper in the same issue as JSH's. The
author (Plotnikov?) claimed to have proven that P=NP. He later
admitted to an error and withdrew the paper.

The more likely story is that SWSPAM (or whoever they were) didn't
have peer-review (despite claiming it), and too many bad papers were
published. Who knows how many others contained mistakes. (I only know
that out of about 6 papers --- from THAT ISSUE --- 2 of them were
wrong. Them's not good odds ...)

But this story has a happy ending for JSH; he got his paper
published ... in an art magazine.

2) Does JSH acknowledge that he has NPD?

Goes back to using attacks based on accusations of mental illness and
how math people are evil.

Simple story is I refused to let nasty people insult me into silence,
and they just kept at it, and got more creative.

I thought he was going to say something like "sci.math'ers think that
they're psychiatrists in addition to mathematicans".

3) Is his writing skill ever a part of what sparks the insult?

Posters have repeatedly told me that my posting ANYTHING AT ALL is
justification for insult.

I have also been told that if math people don't want me here I should
leave!

The math world does not take public space to mean public space.

4) Is JSH a real person?

Uh, I think therefore I am.

The antecedent is open to debate.

***

I originally thought that this thread was going to be a biography of
JSH, where he's lived, that sort of thing. Certainly not an
autobiography on the order of Archimedes Plutonium, because we all
know that JSH is no Archimedes Plutonium.

--- Christopher Heckman

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH "problem"
    ... Axiom 1: JSH is the world's greatest living mathematician. ... RSA factoring is in danger. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH "problem"
    ... Axiom 1: JSH is the world's greatest living mathematician. ... RSA factoring is in danger. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Just plain silly
    ... I wrote the editors to inform them of an error. ... > commenting on the article CAME AFTER PUBLICATION.) ... I was not sent a copy of this review. ... with the exception of those who are fixated on trading insults with JSH, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Bassam, thou art childish
    ... He is not a mathematician. ... JSH is "a professional troll". ... and he is the puppet master. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... So publication in a peer reviewed math journal is not such a context? ... leading mathematician at my alma mater Vanderbilt University where I ... There is no way to convince you people, ...
    (sci.math)