Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- From: aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:21:42 -0700
tommy1729 wrote:
sometimes you defend cantor sometimes you doubt it
What statement of mine do you construe as expressing doubts about
"cantor"?
It is perfectly possible, of course, to conceive all sorts of
interesting and coherent alternative conceptions of mathematics -- as
illustrated by ultra-finitism, predicativism, intuitionism, various
flavours of constructivism, ... -- if one does not find set theoretic
reasoning and concepts congenial. Alas, your erratic rambling does not
constitute such an alternative view.
There is also no reason why anyone should take any interest in your
outpouring, let alone "counter" it in some way, though for some
unfathomable reason many people in the news seem to find that an
extremely important undertaking, perhaps in attempt to protect the
innocent, lest they be led astray.
sometimes you attack me , sometimes you defend me ...
While your "arguments" against set theory are asinine, the responses
they elicit from various persons are sometimes equally silly. My
commenting on such silliness does not imply any sort of endorsement of
your brand of inanity.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- From: Tonico
- Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- References:
- Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- From: tommy1729
- Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- Prev by Date: Re: Infinite series question
- Next by Date: Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- Previous by thread: Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- Next by thread: Re: A quiet query from a visitor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|