Re: cantorian algebra
- From: aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:57:22 -0700
tommy1729 wrote:
if you read for instance the work of Riemann or even better
prof. Andrew Wiles , you will notice an enormous amounts of
connections between "different" branches.
It might amuse you to know that Wiles's proof of Fermat's last theorem
is highly infinitary, and in particular in its current form relies on
the existence of two inaccessible cardinals -- though I have been
assured by experts that removing these, so that the proof goes through
in ZFC, would be routine (for some values of "routine").
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cantorian algebra
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: cantorian algebra
- From: david petry
- Re: cantorian algebra
- References:
- Re: cantorian algebra
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: cantorian algebra
- From: tommy1729
- Re: cantorian algebra
- Prev by Date: Re: What is Z[G] ?
- Next by Date: Re: What is Z[G] ?
- Previous by thread: Re: cantorian algebra
- Next by thread: Re: cantorian algebra
- Index(es):