Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- From: MoeBlee <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:59:41 -0700
On Aug 23, 4:04 pm, david petry <david_lawrence_pe...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Aug 23, 9:39 am, aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
MoeBlee wrote:
If you would either give 'potential infinity' as a primitive and
axioms with it or 'potential infinity' defined from primitives, then
there might be something of specific mathematical interest there.
It would appear that Moeblee didn't understand anything I wrote. I'm
arguing that when we acknowledge that infinity only has a potential
existence, then we see that infinity is merely a figure of speech, and
anything that can be said using the word "infinity" could also be said
without it. The best I could do is present rules for transforming
sentences using "infinity" into sentences not using it, but the
example I gave in the article gives the main idea.
I addressed what you said specifically and in fair detail. Your not
responding to what I said but instead just saying that I don't
understand what you said is purely a rhetorical ploy by you.
MoeBlee
.
- References:
- Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- From: david petry
- Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- From: aatu . koskensilta
- Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- From: david petry
- Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- Prev by Date: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- Next by thread: Re: Does a potential infinity actually exist?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|