Re: quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- From: Angus Rodgers <twirlip@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:53:03 +0100
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:35:49 -0400, quasi
<quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
For this discussion, all polynomials will be elements of Z[x].
Call a polynomial "quasi-cyclotomic" if all of its roots have complex
modulus equal to 1.
[...]
Question (1):
Does there exist a nonconstant, primitive, quasi-cyclotomic polynomial
whose leading coefficient is not 1 or -1?
Note -- by primitive, we mean that the coefficients have no common
factor (in Z).
Question (2):
Does there exist a nonconstant, monic, irreducible quasi-cyclotomic
polynomial which is not cyclotomic?
Note -- if the answer to question (2) is "no", then the answer to
question (1) is automatically also "no".
I don't know anything about this myself, but apparently
there's a theorem of Kronecker which says that all the
roots of a quasi-cyclotomic polynomial are roots of unity:
<http://www.groupsrv.com/science/about89561.html>
Hence, the polynomial divides x^n - 1, for some n; this is
a product of cyclotomic polynomials, which are irreducible;
hence it is itself cyclotomic; so the answer to (2) is "no"
(unless I've boobed as usual).
--
Angus Rodgers
(twirlip@ eats spam; reply to angusrod@)
Contains mild peril
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- From: quasi
- Re: quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- References:
- quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- From: quasi
- quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- Prev by Date: Re: Math is not a memoriter course.
- Next by Date: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- Next by thread: Re: quasi-cyclotomic polynomials
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|