Re: JSH: What if I succeed?

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:16:45 -0000, JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 26, 12:06 pm, rossum <rossu...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:41:59 -0000, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For years I've been talking about using the factoring problem to force
acceptance of my other mathematical research as I figured that if I
demonstrate my problem solving ability with a practical math problem
away from "pure math" then I can get people to pay attention to my
other decried research.

You have been working on the factoring problem problem for years, and
you have still not cracked it.



My take on responses from this newsgroup at least has been a
contemptuous dismissal of any possibility of my success.

So far they are right, you have not yet succeeded.


Maybe you're being honest
I am.

, which still puzzles me.

The answer isn't hard. I've stepped through most of it already.

But like with my prime counting function, it isn't hard to check me on
details like partial difference equations and counting primes.
Your prime counting method is correct. I coded it up and tested it.
It gives the correct results.


That makes the situation strange.

Do you really believe what you're saying? Or are you a front for some
intelligence organization or organizations?
If you thought carefully about what answers I would give to that
question then you would not have bothered to ask it.

1 I am genuine and not a front: I answer no.
2 I am a front but am under orders to deny it: I answer no.
3 I am not a front but I am a liar: I answer yes.
4 I am a front but I disobey my orders to deny it: I answer yes.

My answer is 1: I am genuine and am not a front.

Of course I will answer no - to say yes means that I am either
disobedient or a liar and I am neither.


How many operatives have been working here and why?

Why focus so hard on blocking acceptance of my mathematical research?
I am a practical person. When your factoring method works faster than
existing methods I will use it. Until then I will use the fastest
method available.


Or are you just some regular person who can't understand basic
algebra?
I am a regular person who can understand some basic algebra. As I
said I am practically biased; when your factoring method works quickly
I will use it. Your surrogate method does find factors - all my tests
have shown that. The issue is that currently it finds them slowly.


What country? Countries? Organizations?

Or just some nobody math person fighting against a truth you don't
want?


How do I check? How do I know?
You really should get some help. The route you are on seems likely to
lead to unhappiness.

rossum



James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: What if I succeed?
    ... demonstrate my problem solving ability with a practical math problem ... Why focus so hard on blocking acceptance of my mathematical research? ... What country? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: What if I succeed?
    ... demonstrate my problem solving ability with a practical math problem ... Why focus so hard on blocking acceptance of my mathematical research? ... you cannot, be afraid, very afraid, we know where you live, your address and ...
    (sci.math)
  • Comparisons between SR and LET.
    ... The above has to be accepted for several reasons. ... They have the same math. ... predictions is the base for the scientific acceptance ... The physics is very ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • JSH: What if I succeed?
    ... For years I've been talking about using the factoring problem to force ... acceptance of my other mathematical research as I figured that if I ... demonstrate my problem solving ability with a practical math problem ... trot out a solution that shows that factoring is a trivially easy ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: What if I succeed?
    ... acceptance of my other mathematical research as I figured that if I ... demonstrate my problem solving ability with a practical math problem ... trot out a solution that shows that factoring is a trivially easy ... make my latest "surrogate factoring" approach work at a time like this ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast