Re: Geometrical Quaternions
- From: "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com" <tttpppggg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 05:17:04 -0700
On Aug 31, 6:47 am, "Jacky" <j...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suddenly find out in a book that a quatN can be replaced by a matrix even
having an arbitrary axis.
But this is a 3x3 matrix... I wonder why we needn't to have a homogenous
matrix in this case (as introduced in the book)
Or I am thinking in the wrong way?
thanks
Jack
Though the mathematical quaternion is a 4D structure I have talked
with people here who think of it as a 3D structure. I believe they
throw away the real component and that is how they get sensible 3D
results.
-Tim
.
- References:
- Geometrical Quaternions
- From: Jacky
- Re: Geometrical Quaternions
- From: Jacky
- Geometrical Quaternions
- Prev by Date: Re: help!
- Next by Date: Re: Distrbuted Computing - counting prime numbers in 0 - 10^15
- Previous by thread: Re: Geometrical Quaternions
- Next by thread: Re: Geometrical Quaternions
- Index(es):