Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: David Bernier <david250@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:12:17 -0400
Michael Press wrote:
In article <23698964.1188588087624.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
orum.org>,
"T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 31, 2:56 am, "T.H. Ray" <thray...@xxxxxxx>You may think you're debating. I am only reciting facts.
wrote:
That mathematics is a liberal art is not debatable.And yet here we are debating it! Go figure.
After all, to some, even the claim of creationism vs.
evolution is a "debate."
My first rule of debate is when there are two
well defined positions, they are both wrong.
This thread reminds me of the curious question:
Is the question as to whether some matter is a matter of fact (or else a matter of opinion)
a matter of fact (or else a matter of opinion)? Does the answer depend
on the matter in question?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: T.H. Ray
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- References:
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Prev by Date: Re: Analysis with integral.
- Next by Date: Re: Geometrical Quaternions
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|