Re: Paul R Halmos, Measure Theory, Sec 36, Question (2)

Thanks. But, when I apply fubini's law, there's no contradiction?
Each iterated integral is 0.

BTW: is there any way to prove the conclusion without fubini's law?
Say, through the definition of Lebesque measure?

Thanks.

Wei

Allan Adler <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fubinate
--
Ignorantly,
Allan Adler <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and
* comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: FOAK. How do I buy some shares?
    ... about it I'd go through the legal and democratic channels of response. ... twats) bunny huggers just drive a bus through the rule of law and the ... that's not like you:) I agree, BTW. I'm fairly sure that, were ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Ex-CIA Official Challenges Logic of U.S. Fight in Afghanistan
    ... know more about security clearances and the related documents you sign ... BTW, why aren't you in Afghanistan supporting your terrorist friends? ... BTW - A CIA agent can't talk by law ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: DRUGGISTS REFUSE TO GIVE OUT PILL
    ... >> Should these pharmacists be compelled under law to fill prescriptions? ... BTW I do think that this druggists ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: Turbo Delphi Upgrade
    ... which in worst case would lead to a sentence in court. ... BTW - going to jail for this? ... But what is worse is that the law is not simply ... Then you should be on safe ground. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Outside lane seige numpties
    ... In article, Rob ...
    (uk.rec.driving)