JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 10:26:00 -0700
I have "pure math" research that I say is important, while
mathematicians have in various ways denied that, even when I had
backup, albeit brief, from mathematicians who published some of my
research in the now defunct journal SWJPAM.
So I say my work is important, yet mathematicians say, in various
ways, so that it can be a symbolic say, that it is not, which leaves
me with a quandary, as it's my word against theirs.
So I went to the factoring problem.
If as I say mathematicians routinely lie about math, and I do come up
with a viable factoring approach then it stands to reason that they
would CONTINUE to lie, but other people might use the research anyway.
But then again, I might simply be unable to come up with a viable
approach to the factoring problem.
However, if I come up with an approach then if it is NOT viable then
mathematicians, supposedly brilliant, should be able to settle it, and
simply proclaim me as just being the crackpot who has nothing--and
prove it.
Otherwise they leave the world at the wrong end of the whip where
BILLIONS of dollars US, as in yes, BILLIONS of dollars could swing in
hours on what is the truth, and that is the lever.
Archimedes said, give me a lever long enough and a solid place to
stand and I can move the world.
We live in a world that has learned to dismiss ideas, and believes
that genius can be controlled.
The death of modern mathematics as a viable discipline so that science
depends on the discoveries of past mathematicians is about attempts at
controlling creativity squeezing the life out of the modern research
world.
But these people are about politics, so they work to convince, and if
they get something wrong then entire economies can fall.j
The entire planet of humanity can believe the world is flat and be
wrong.
Belief can be just a way for you to get yourself killed. And LOTS of
people believing the same thing can be just a way for you to get
yourselves all killed.
What did the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki believe?
Did that matter?
So for you there is the question on which your life savings can
depend--the potential to lose everything you have worked your entire
life for, literally, overnight, because some people you do not even
know, lied.
Lose everything.
No retirement. No golden years looking back but working harder than
ever knowing that everything you did before was lost because you
trusted the wrong people.
Or there is nothing here and I'm just a loudmouth on Usenet babbling
nonsense, and you can trust those math people you don't even know to
keep you safe, and keep your retirement safe, and keep your family
safe.
Or force mathematicians to settle the question:
Does surrogate factoring work or not? If not, what is the
mathematical analysis that proves it does not?
Or sit and wait, and stay at the wrong end of the whip and see how
long you get yanked around.
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- Prev by Date: Re: PDF to TeX?
- Next by Date: Re: Ctyptography & network secutity
- Previous by thread: Re: Finding shortest path into unweighted undirected graph
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|