Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: "T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:18:02 EDT
"T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx> writes:
As I said, and which is not controversial, anyconsistent result
from any self consistent system of axioms is true.
Really? So it is true that, say, Peano arithmetic is
inconsistent?
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man
schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus
s Logico-Philosophicus
"T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx> writes:
As I said, and which is not controversial, anyconsistent result
from any self consistent system of axioms is true.
Really? So it is true that, say, Peano arithmetic is
inconsistent?
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man
schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus
s Logico-Philosophicus
Why would you say that? The axioms of Peano (I
prefer to say Dedekind-Peano) are certainly self-
consistent.
If I venture to try and interpret what you mean--that
(as Godel proved) no system of axioms is strong enough
to prove its own consistency--such does not obviate
anything that I said.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- References:
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Next by Date: Re: Latitude / longitude distance and bearing.
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Index(es):