Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud



On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:19:32 -0700, JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

But if the idea turns out to be a brilliant one which means factoring
is not a hard problem after all, then how can mathematicians who not
only couldn't figure it out, but who ignored it when presented with it
be considered to be true experts in the field?
In its current version surrogate factoring is too slow to be
considered "brilliant". Only when you have speeded it up sufficiently
can it be considered brilliant. Slow factoring methods are a
dime-a-dozen. The difficult part is finding a *fast* factoring
method, that is a polynomial time rather than an exponential time
method. So far your method seems to be exponential time, or do you
have a proof that it is polynomial time?

All the indications so far are that factoring is a hard problem, which
can only be confirmed by the fact that you have been working on it for
years and have still not cracked it.

[snip]

With my prime counting research I first found my prime counting
function, and then proved how it was different from anything else
previously known as to this day no one can give any other partial
difference equation used to count prime numbers, and no other known
that finds primes on its own.
Your prime counting function works fine.

rossum

[snip]

James Harris

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ultimate check, new way to factor or not?
    ... polynomial time. ... a new factoring algorithm. ... Greg Rose ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
    ... that is a polynomial time rather than an exponential time ... If practicality is all that matters then acknowledge that "pure math" ... Let's say that down the line someone proves that surrogate factoring ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Nearly done
    ... my response to your "polynomial time" below.) ... algorithms really are, so I'll tell you: For a factoring algorithm to ... it doesn't hurt to use recursion in a "proof of concept" ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ultimate check, new way to factor or not?
    ... > polynomial time. ... Now, factoring is in general hard, with *certain* types of numbers, ... the mathematics or what's possible, but only in trying to dismiss my ... while certain key features of my discovery make it very exciting, ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, a fascinating idea
    ... > If mathematicians just ignore the result, however, and someone out ... > factoring is a hard problem. ... Bartosz Zoltak ...
    (sci.crypt)