Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:52:38 -0400
Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
T.H. Ray wrote:
One has to be careful of what one is talking about
here. Evolution is a fact in evidence, observable
and observed. The explanation for evolution is Darwin's
theory of common ancestry.
What we actually _observe_ is kind of common "design".
Darwin's theory has been
much researched and refined in the last 150 years.
It has received so much criticism as well. Look, I can understand that
science should not allow God into its theories. But IF we are forced to
distort a theory, for the sole reason that kind of an intelligence would
be needed to proceed, are we still doing honest science then? (Mind the
"if" clause in the above)
So you are sympathetic to Intelligent Design theory?
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"You shouldn't hate Mother Mathematics."
-- James S. Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- References:
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: T.H. Ray
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Next by Date: Re: how to list all of the real numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Next by thread: Re: Mathematics: art or science?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|