Re: JSH: Surrogate factoring, periodic behavior


"rossum" <rossum48@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mbfid3d1k65p4a06vlqqc8uj0lpl5fmiu4@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 05:21:41 -0000, JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Factored trying 5 surrogates on the fifth surrogate using k=1 where
the start was with n=7.
I ran my usual tests again on 500 random composite odd numbers that
are multiples of two different primes, each in the range 500 to 1000.
The results are compared to Fermat's method, trial factorisation (both
forward and reverse) and random picking.

Fermat average = 7.58 probes.
JSH average = 1635.83 probes.
Probe ratio = 1 : 215.752
Trial average = 118.52 probes.
Reverse average = 12.12 probes.
Random average = 727.79 probes.

500 trials, 0 misfactors found.



bad, very bad hit to JSH ! His SF is totally sunk!

more than 215 times worse than Fermat,

His SF is more than 2 times slower than random guessing !!!

It will be renamed to Surrogate Non-Factoring theory.

The Troll is revealed as a Fool. JSH - Just not very smart.

We are right in keeping a block on all JSH work,
we will send JSH to North Korea, where he will add his confusion to Dear
Leader and delay their nuculear program for YEARS and YEARS.



.

Loading