Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:14:20 -0400
JSH wrote:
Sounds like you're ready to defend on every point, so your position is
clear, and now if that position is refuted ultimately by the evidence,
so that everything you said falls apart like a house of cards, what
then?
There's that word "if" again. You don't get it, do you?
Can you get what I'm emphasizing here? That the math community cannot
have its cake and eat it too?
I want it clear that if you turn out to be wrong you lose the title of
experts.
Even experts can be wrong sometimes. Did Einstein's insistence on the Cosmological Constant make him a non-expert? No.
Get it? So it's not about me asking anything from you except clarity
on this position.
No, *you* don't get it.
I want you and your community to understand that if I force this and
prove that I am correct, you lose the title "mathematicians".
History has proved you wrong already... (ooh, a double entendre!)
.
- References:
- JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: jankrihau
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: junoexpress
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: marcus_b
- Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- From: JSH
- JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- Prev by Date: Re: Affine transformation
- Next by Date: Re: Affine transformation
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Contradictory behavior, issue of math fraud
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|