Re: Discount Rate Question
- From: Axel Vogt <&noreply@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 11:19:04 +0200
Ray Vickson wrote:
On Sep 8, 1:18 pm, Axel Vogt <&nore...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Rob Bain wrote:Hi30 years ... only two "inputs" ... here is a brute way:
If I have the NPV of a cash stream calculated with a discount rate of
8%, and the NPV of the same cash stream calculated using 6%, can I
calculate the NPV at 3.5%?
I don't think this is possible (no unique solution) - but I'd be very
interested in members' views. Is there, for example, an 'approximate'
or 'most likely' solution???
Thanks,
Rob
If I understand correctly you want to know the interal rate
of return having two different inputs, time is 30 years, yes?
Here is a brute way:
Determine r1, such that exp(-r1 * t ) = your first NPV and r2
your 2nd NPV (same formula, t = 30) using the log function.
This won't work. NPV1 = sum(X_n*exp(-r1*n),n=0..29) is not of the form
exp(-r1*T) for any T. Basically, the OP has NPV1 as above and NPV2 =
sum(x_n*exp(-r2*n),n=0..29) (or, instead of exp, maybe 1/(1+r1)^n,
etc.) He has two equations in the 30 variables x_0,...,x_29, so there
will be infinitely many possible solutions. I don't think the OP can
have what he wants, and even approximations seem unavailable. For
example, one could try to represent the "exp" exp(-r*n) as a simple
linear combination of exp(-r1*n) and exp(-r2*n) (although, due to
convexity, that would be an /overestimate/), but even that would
require knowing sums of the form sum(n*x_n*exp(-r1*n)) and
sum(n*x_n*exp(-r2*n)), which have not been given.
I think the simple answer is NO.
The point is: the present values are the same for the paths.
It works, it is getting rates from discount factors. May be I was
not clear enough, so: NPV1 = sum(X_n*exp(-R1*n),n=0..29) is given,
R1 his 8%, so NPV1 * finalValue = exp(-r1*t) * finalValue can be
solved for r1 (t is a fixed value, not a variable) and then the
r3 is guessed through linear interpolation ignoring convexity
(cf Jannick's reply).
Anyway: in a formal sense the question does not make sense, and I
doubt the OP 'knows' the NPV (for economical reasons it is 'constant'
and the cashflows must be according), since he may not estimate the
finalValue nor does he describe the structure of the contract or
project.
Certainly it is not the problem whether paying up front or not
(that is just a disagio or a (rolling) skonto [sorry, forgot the
english expressions for those]) or more generally of payment plan
and value conditions for invoices.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Discount Rate Question
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Discount Rate Question
- References:
- Discount Rate Question
- From: Rob Bain
- Re: Discount Rate Question
- From: Axel Vogt
- Discount Rate Question
- Prev by Date: michael lalonde sudbury
- Next by Date: Re: Message from Osama Ben Laden to the USA people (new video)
- Previous by thread: Re: Discount Rate Question
- Next by thread: Re: Discount Rate Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|