Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:04:24 GMT
In article <d3n3e3luublpm0cvlguhngk2eu4or1c61g@xxxxxxx> quasi@xxxxxxxx writes:
2x U 3x = 0 mod 6 U 2 mod 6 U 3 mod 6
You forgot one: U (4 mod 6)
seems very similar !!
Well, you have a good point.
And in another article I gave the simple outline of a proof that there is
no polynomial that will work.
However it's easy to prove that a univariate polynomial can't work.
Indeed. If you have two polynomials f(x) and g(x) of degree n and m,
if there is a polynomial such that range(f) U range(g) = range(h) than
h can not have degree larger than max{n,m}.
I don't think 2 variables will work either, but I don't have a proof
of that.
But more variables provide lots of flexibility, so who knows?
Indeed. There is a polynomial with many variables, that (when the
result is positive) gives only primes as result.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- From: quasi
- Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- References:
- Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- From: quasi
- Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- From: tommy1729
- Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- From: quasi
- Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- Prev by Date: Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: new prime factoring location
- Previous by thread: Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- Next by thread: Re: once quasi asked about unions of sets ...
- Index(es):