Re: #21sept11/10:30pm transcendental number theory has to be revamped Re: ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANG THEORY IN PHYSICS

a_plutonium <a_plutonium@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

In this manner the e-axis and pi-axis represent in combination all
transcendental numbers.
So when someone finds a new transcendental number such as the Euler
gamma function number
0.5772156649.... it is to be found on one of those axis and not the
other.

Now then, someone hands you i + k, then you look to see if it is on
the i axis, and it is not.
Nor is it on the k axis. Ditto for pi + e.

The meaning of "mutually exclusive" deals with scalar multiples of pi
or e. It is not applicable to
addition.

I see! You're incapable of basic self-expression!

Here's what you wrote:

I claim only pi and e are vector transcendentals and all other
transcendental numbers are scalar multiples of either pi or either e
but not both.

But you didn't mean it. You meant: All the transcendental numbers
that are scalar multiples of pi or e are scalar multiples of pi and
e.

Can't argue with that.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Well, you know as soon as you have a new number I will be happy to
add it to the list. Don't try those childish tit-for-tat games with
me." -- Ross Finlayson on Cantor's theorem.
.

Relevant Pages