Re: TOMMYS CONJECTURE sorry quasi way above 5.
- From: tommy1729 <tommy1729@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:42:21 EDT
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:25:30 -0700, David R Tribble
<david@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tommy1729 wrote:times primes^2
tommy's conjecture:
(1 = prime)
every positive integer is the sum of at most 8
Conjecture?
How is this more impressive than Goldbach's
integer
If Golbach's Conjecture is true, then every positive
is either the sum of two primes (p1+p2, even) or thesum
of two primes plus one (p1+p2+1, odd).
Tommy's conjecture relates to sums of _squares_ of
primes.
He conjectures that every positive integer is a sum
of at most 8
squares of primes (where primes are extended to
include 1).
Why 8 and not less? I don't know. I'm sure he has his
reasons.
3 is too obviously too low, since a number of the
form 8k+7 is not a
sum of 3 or fewer squares of positive integers, much
less primes.
Is 4 too low? I'm not sure.
of course , we already need 4 squares to represent all integers
But even if there are
counterexamples
there are , they are in my sequence given below
, the
more significant question is whether there are there
infinitely many
such counterexamples.
yep infinitely many.
I think the related density question is also
interesting, and possibly
within reach of currently known methods:
How many squares of primes (or 1) need to be summed
to reach density
1? I suspect at most 5, but I could be wrong.
However, I'm pretty sure
it's less than 8.
nope 8.
quasi
see my sequence:
http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A096436
notice 795 requires 8.
and already 73 requires more than 5.
robert g wilson bets on =< 9
regards
tommy1729
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TOMMYS CONJECTURE sorry quasi way above 5.
- From: quasi
- Re: TOMMYS CONJECTURE sorry quasi way above 5.
- References:
- Re: Number Theory Conjecture TOMMYS CONJECTURE
- From: quasi
- Re: Number Theory Conjecture TOMMYS CONJECTURE
- Prev by Date: Re: Solution Manuals Available now in PDF!
- Next by Date: Re: Solution Manuals Available now in PDF!
- Previous by thread: Re: Number Theory Conjecture TOMMYS CONJECTURE
- Next by thread: Re: TOMMYS CONJECTURE sorry quasi way above 5.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|