Re: Region of convergence
- From: The World Wide Wade <aderamey.addw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:32:04 -0700
In article <1189701975.244141@athprx03>,
"I.N. Galidakis" <morpheus@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The World Wide Wade wrote:
[snip]
Reread your response and see if it makes any sense to you.
I have no idea what you are talking about. I summarized my response in a reply
to quasi. Please comment there.
It's really quite simple. You responded to my post. Your response was
a lot of nonsense. That's why I asked you to reread it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Region of convergence
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Region of convergence
- References:
- Region of convergence
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Region of convergence
- From: quasi
- Re: Region of convergence
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Region of convergence
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Region of convergence
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Region of convergence
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Region of convergence
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Let's recap
- Next by Date: Re: Treating Magnitude as Fundamental
- Previous by thread: Re: Region of convergence
- Next by thread: Re: Region of convergence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|