Re: JSH: Unfair burden
- From: marcus_b <marcus_bruckner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:03:02 -0700
On Sep 15, 1:21 pm, JSH <jst...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Surrogate factoring is my answer to a math community that does not
follow its own rules, which has to date ignored proof after proof
after proof that challenges closely held beliefs and the current
status quo.
[Usual social-whining SNIPPED]
You are willfully ignoring a new way to factor.
It HAS to be fundamental as I just included k = 2x mod T, with the
already well known and very much studied x^2 = y^2 mod T.
Such a seemingly minor addition is at a fundamental level but despite
that I took a year presenting it giving your community an opportunity
to show it a trivial addition and your community could not.
You claim you can factor T with the use of at most 16
surrogates, starting with x = floor(sqrt(T)), k = 2x,
n in the range nmin to nmax [usually -8 to +1], and
the surrogate S = 2k^2 + nT.
So, please show in detail how your method of factoring
works for
T = 9524208139.
Marcus
[note: I haven't tried surrogate factoring on this - it
may work. I am guessing it will not do particularly well.]
It is increasingly clear that mathematicians have taken an absolute
blah blah blah ...
[more whining snipped]
Look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki as they were on those fateful days to
see what can happen.
James Harris
.
- References:
- JSH: Unfair burden
- From: JSH
- JSH: Unfair burden
- Prev by Date: Re: finding limits?
- Next by Date: Vector or Tensor (Valence=2)
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Unfair burden
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Unfair burden
- Index(es):