Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: theronruiz@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:12:05 -0700
On Sep 17, 10:12 am, mike3 <mike4...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I dug up an interesting thread here where a method was given that
might be able to extend
tetration to the reals, at least for a base of sqrt(2). You can see
the thread at this link:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_frm/thread/39a7019f9051c5d7/b3c8db1d7d0ec0da?lnk=st&q=%22Tetration%22+%2B%22square+root+of+two%22&rnum=1&hl=en#b3c8db1d7d0ec0da
The proposed method in this thread is flawed. The generated "curve"
has branches, so it is not a function. This is easily observable in hi-
res plot of the "curve".
This proves experimentally that there is no function f: (-2; +oo) -> R
such that:
f(x) = y <=> f(-y) = -x (1)
f(x + 1) = sqrt(2)^f(x) (2)
f(0) = 1 (3)
Theron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: lwalke3
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: theronruiz
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Your funeral
- Next by Date: What would happen if the imaginary 'unit' length was 1/2 of root 2?
- Previous by thread: Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- Next by thread: Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|