Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM <mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:05:45 -0700
On 17 Sep., 22:50, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
WM wrote:
On 17 Sep., 21:47, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Based on what premise? If you already knew the first 10^100 digits ofDo you disagree that, for any rational number, it can be distinguishedI diagree. The rational number which is made up from the first 10^100
from pi, as being either greater or less than pi?
digits of pi and a subsequent 5 cannot be distinguished from pi as
being greaer or less.
pi, you couldn't calculate the next digit and tell if it were greater or
less than 5? To whatever accuracy you have attained, you can attain
greater, so that argument flops with me. Sorry.
It is impossible to know the first 10^100 digits of pi because the
universe including your and my brain has less memory space.
Then you could not have a rational number of that accuracy to begin
with, and the question becomes moot, because you don't have the rational
number to compare.
Of course there is no such rational number. Otherwise the question
could be answered. My point is that this question cannot be answered.
So, let me try again. Given that you could actually represent some
rational number, do you disagree that you could determine whether it was
greater than or less than pi?
Given you would use all ressources to represent your rational number,
then no ressources would remain to store the digits of pi (and. taken
exactly, no ressources would remain to establish a comparing device
like your brain). The existence of large numbers is not independent of
the choice which should be represented. The possibility to represent
every number we wish, independently of those which already have a
representation, exists only for very small numbers.
Have you seen my model M7? It makes this all very clear on an easily
understandable basis:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.research/msg/a07444cf340546d5?dmode=source&hl=de
It is.All numbers are ideas, but there is a difference between the point onIt does.
the real line and the digital representation of it. No completed digital
representation, in any natural base, exists for pi. That doesn't mean
the point doesn't exist on the real line.
Try to show it.
Behold! Observe my circle of unit diameter, upon the circumference of
which I have marked a point, right here.
What is the diameter of your pencil? Is it really very sharp?
Everything that exists, exists in physics, is limited by physics
Mathematics needs physics for representation.
I am not sure Heisenberg needs to be applied to mathematics for it to be
mathematics.
including Heisenberg, and underlies the laws of physics in general.
Except theology and matheology.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- References:
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- Prev by Date: Re: help about negative defineteness
- Next by Date: Re: help about negative defineteness
- Previous by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Next by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|