Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: Gottfried Helms <helms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:10:50 +0200
Hi Ioannis -
Am 21.09.2007 18:25 schrieb I.N. Galidakis:
So from your method you get
2^^(1/2)=1.45878170484
Looks like your value is in close agreement with Andrew's approximation.
Yes, it came out (discussed in the tetration-forum), that the methods
are essentially the same.
Hence your extension disagrees with the tetraroots as well.
Yes, it must be, I'm afraid. So this is my concern in the
last two posts. You see, I was much involved last weeks to
solve the core point of my approach, and although I was
reading through many articles (also yours several times),
I still have difficulties to understand some other concepts-
I couldn't allow to lose the focus. It's like I was hunting
the deer, and couldn't engage to understand the properties
of the elefant, some others were hunting...
So my question was: could the problem of incompatibility
with the tetra-roots be shown in any of the steps, which
I have given in my previous posts? I might then be able
to explore the reason for the different answers...
Kind regards-
Gottfried
--
---
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
.
- References:
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: theronruiz
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: theronruiz
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: theronruiz
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: mike3
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: Gottfried Helms
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- From: I.N. Galidakis
- Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- Prev by Date: Re: Probabilty question
- Next by Date: Re: Did anyone ever get a manual?
- Previous by thread: Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- Next by thread: Re: Bringing back an old tetration curiosity?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|