Re: More of Tommy's integrals
- From: quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:30:33 -0400
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:54:42 -0700, neilist <littoralee@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213,
214 ...
to neilist:
You are obviously very intelligent.
You are also extremely witty.
But you are clearly descending into a kind of craziness.
Obviously, you get pleasure out of baiting and insulting those who you
have declared as "cranks". Moreover you are very skilled at this
baiting/insult game. And it clearly is just a game for you -- a kind
of entertainment.
But can't you see that it risks a progressive transition to the same
insanity you think you are debunking?
Moreover, it's a complete waste of your potential.
Unfortunately, you may be just as hopeless a case as JSH -- trapped by
the addictive pleasures of your own personal narcissistic ego trip.
Hence, I don't actually expect you to change.
But I thought I'd at least suggest it.
quasi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- More of Tommy's integrals
- From: neilist
- More of Tommy's integrals
- Prev by Date: Re: 9.- Characterizing primes.
- Next by Date: Reposts are pointless - and so is responding to cranky Tommy
- Previous by thread: More of Tommy's integrals
- Next by thread: Response to Quasi - the error in my ways. Or is it errata?
- Index(es):