Re: Response to Quasi - the error in my ways. Or is it errata?
- From: neilist <littoralee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:33:34 -0700
On Sep 21, 5:57 pm, quasi <qu...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:46:39 -0700, neilist <littora...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Fear not. My latest new post regarding Tommy and swine was not in
response to you, but how appropriate to cease this pointlessness while
also responding to you positively.
Perhaps we could negotiate a truce between you and tommy?
to tommy1729:
How about, starting immediately, not insulting neilist? In fact, not
even mentioning neilist's name, either directly or indirectly. Feel
free to insult others, though -- separate negotiations would be
required for those (and separate fees).
to neilist:
The same as above, except, where it refers to "neilist", substitute
"tommy1729".
quasi
Who? What? Where? I'm doing math, and only took a break to
respond ;-)
Hey, I thought you implied that insults, even of others, was making me
INSAIN! Get behind me, Satan. I'm busy doing my immature math.
As to Bassam, Fernando said to vie with him via math.
So back to doin' da matematiks.
Cognito ergo I do sums.
.
- References:
- More of Tommy's integrals
- From: neilist
- Re: More of Tommy's integrals
- From: quasi
- Response to Quasi - the error in my ways. Or is it errata?
- From: neilist
- Re: Response to Quasi - the error in my ways. Or is it errata?
- From: quasi
- More of Tommy's integrals
- Prev by Date: Re: Google DELETES my posts here! Go to www.ghostNASA.com >>>
- Next by Date: Re: 9.- Characterizing primes.
- Previous by thread: Re: Response to Quasi - the error in my ways. Or is it errata?
- Next by thread: need a solution manual
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
