Re: Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- From: Colin <colinpoakes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:42:03 -0700
On Sep 22, 11:38 pm, "elsiemelsi" <cyprin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Before everyone gets in a huff over this post (which for some people
is already too late), just bear in mind that this post is a collasal
joke. The potser makes it clear that
This is a case study by colin leslie dean demonstrating his broader
claim that all views end in meaninglessness.
If Colin Leslie Dean really does believe that "all views end in
meaninglessness," then his views concerning Godel's Theorem(s) must
themselves end in meaninglessness.
So, by attempting to rebut Mr. Dean's view you're attempting to rebut
a view that Mr. Dean himself acknowledges as meaningless. Hence,
you've swallowed the bait of an obvious troll hook, line, and sinker,
and the poster is simply laughing at you as he reels you in.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- From: elsiemelsi
- Re: Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- References:
- Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- From: elsiemelsi
- Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- Prev by Date: Re: Discontinuity
- Next by Date: content
- Previous by thread: Re: Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- Next by thread: Re: Godels incompleteness theorm proven wrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|