Re: Linear operators 3
- From: jennifer <scrilla_12_1999@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:27:18 -0700
On Sep 23, 1:05 pm, magi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin) wrote:
In article <1190529421.872576.145...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jennifer <scrilla_12_1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
But how do you ?
(i) Say how you "add" two elements of C^1([0,1]), and show that the
result will be in C^1([0,1]);
(ii) Say how you "multiply" an element of C^1([0,1]) by a scalar,
and show the result will be in C^1([0,1]);
(iii) Then show that, with those definitions of vector addition and
scalar multiplication, C^1([0,1])
Do you know any way by which, given a CONTINUOUS function f, you can
obtain a function F such that F' = f?
Fundamental theorem of Calculus!!!
Define addition in C^1([0,1]) by: (f+g)' = f' +g ' for f,g in
C^1([0,1])
NO. NO. NO. NO. NO.
Why are you differentiating? WHY?
THINK!!!!
You are given TWO FUNCTIONS f and g, with domain [0,1], and codomain
the real numbers; they are each differntiable, and both f' and g' are
continuous.
You want to ADD f AND g. You don't want to differentiate. You want to
add f and g to get a THIRD function, h, whose domain is also [0,1],
whose codomain is the real numbers; and then you want to show that h
will be differentiable and that h' will be continuous. ->THAT'S<- when
you are going to use derivatives; to check that your proposed h also
lies in C^1([0,1]). But you don't use derivatives to define the SUM OF
FUNCTIONS.
(af)' = af' for a in F, was a typo previously
Once again, I strongly urge you to drop this course. It is clear that
you are not ready for it.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
Sorry to dissapoint you but I will never quit,not like YOU, but i
would recommend you quit giving me a hard time and quit your position
at the University as I am sure that you have a lot of students who
think you are an arrogant and not exactly the best Lecturer out their.
Oh did i forget something, no!!!! you don't deserve to be called a
professor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linear operators 3
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Linear operators 3
- References:
- Linear operators 3
- From: jennifer
- Re: Linear operators 3
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: Linear operators 3
- From: jennifer
- Re: Linear operators 3
- From: jennifer
- Re: Linear operators 3
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Linear operators 3
- Prev by Date: Re: text book solutions
- Next by Date: Re: Linear operators 3
- Previous by thread: Re: Linear operators 3
- Next by thread: Re: Linear operators 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|