Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: David R Tribble <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:56:07 -0000
Tony Orlow wrote:
You didn't answer the question. Given any particular rational number,
can it be distinguished from pi?
WM wrote:
If you use all ressources for representing a rational number, then you
cannot compare it to pi because pi then does not and cannot exist. At
best you can use abaout 10^100 bits to represent the first 10^100 bits
of pi and about another 10^100 bits to represent a rational number.
If I use an algorithm to compute subsequent digits of pi (and
these algorithms do, in fact, exist), why would I bother storing
all n-1 previous digits of pi while comparing it to some rational
p/q, when I need only one digit of cosmic storage to hold the
nth digit?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- References:
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- Prev by Date: Re: Solution Manual for Calculus. WANTED
- Next by Date: Re: HAha!! I HAVE DONE THE GRAPHICS FOR F.L.T. SIMPLE SOLUTION - Adam style...
- Previous by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Next by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|