Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:08:26 -0700
On Sep 26, 11:18 am, WM <mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 26 Sep., 16:48, William Hughes <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
No. omega is the *complete column*, a set of elements.
There is no element in the complete column that
is not in the set of rows. Thus there is no element
in the complete column that completes the set of elements
of the column. The *complete column* is not *completed*.
Then we can say omega + 1 = omega?
No. If you append one 1 to the *complete column* you
get a different column of length omega +1.
The fact that *complete column* is not *completed*
does not change this fact. Even though the *complete
column* is not *completed* there is no hole where we
could stick the one.
- William Hughes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- References:
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: WM
- Re: Two results of set geometry
- Prev by Date: Re: how many tommy primes exist ?
- Next by Date: Re: Question from an Irish pre-undergrad
- Previous by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Next by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|