Re: Reciprocity
- From: hag@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:49:24 GMT
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:01:31 GMT, hag@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:38:21 -0700, hagen <dan5mark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:If you accept my stems, you have to accept the whole package, because
A collection of my new figures over my contrary interpretation of theEvidently it only takes an excuse on the seize of a microbe not to be
Phaistos disc as a calendar for inquisitive spectators (but it is
language, isn't it? that scumbag!)
Regards
Ole Hagen
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/step.htm
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/newton.htm
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/circ.htm
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/zzjagt2.htm
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/anecdotes.htm
objective, when a researching person has obtained the nearly
impossible break-through.
It seems, as if my opponents have been infected by such microbe ;-)
Hagen
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/proof.htm
my practical observations are just consequences of the stems. So if I
had had (a mild fortune) my humble request complied with from the
start.,- for a rapid publication of my coded alphabetic notation of
the stems, then those exact same consequences would have been
confirmed from every quarter of the globe by people in a matter of
months.
The science of counting things is basically the discipline of turning
problems into enumeration statements to find out if they can be solved
this way
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/fig02.htm
Hagen
.
- References:
- Reciprocity
- From: hagen
- Re: Reciprocity
- From: hag
- Reciprocity
- Prev by Date: Re: help segment in R^2
- Next by Date: Re: Confusion on differentiable functions on R^2
- Previous by thread: Re: Reciprocity
- Next by thread: Vortex points.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
