Re: mirror question

On Sep 28, 4:12 am, tommy1729 <tommy1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
xi(z) is mirrored by x = 1/2

what function is mirrored by y = exp(x)

regards
tommy1729
I'll try not to be as inflamatory as Eddie was
was (perhaps he has read more of your posts than I),
I'll just point out that you did not say what "xi(z)"
meant, you did not say what you meant by "mirrored
by" and although I can guess that "x= 1/2" refers to
the line x= 1/2 in an xy-coordinate system, I can't
be sure because you did not say so.

When you post a question in which pretty much
uch every important term is undefined, yes, some
people are going to get annoyed. When you do that,
day after day, some people are going to respond with
heat.

but xi(z) is a well known function ....

at least to REAL mathematicians.

so its basicly saying like ;
hey you did not define sin(x) yet

the z in xi(z) refers to a complex number , therefore we have indeed an xy coordinate system.

it is also common knowledge that xi(z) = xi(1-z)

thereby everything apart from the trivial is in fact defined.

but eddie is just a newbie who only posted 3 times, and clearly not a mathematician.

he does not know anything about zeta(z) or xi(z).

so as usual on this forum if you dont understand the OP , compensate your ignorance by insulting the OP.

instead of
admitting you dont have the intelligence to understand
or simply asking to explain with more details...

i am of course aware that someone who does not know about xi(z) might not understand the post.

but that should not be a reason to act like an ass towards an OP mentioning it.

also if you dont know about xi(z) i dont think it is likely you can give an answer...

i did not even have to mention xi(z) !!!

i did it for clarity.

so that you would better understand what i meant with mirrored and y = exp(x).

it is clear that you got the idea
( despite perhaps not knowing about xi(z) ? )

so apart from talking about the indecent behaviour of newbies or the way i write ;

whats your answer to the question ?

regards
tommy1729- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The finite set of REAL mathematicians includes 'rationals' and
'irrationals'.
So what is your exact point here? :-)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tis a sad day in this froup
    ... experience with Eddie. ... I dont think I've laughed this hard in my life. ... Neil, I'm suprised at your lack of posts thus far. ...
    (microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse)
  • Re: Web broadcast: Predatory behavior at AA meetings
    ... just reading yer posts fulla hate. ... I dont use others posts, ... Learn to express yerself a bit better, eddie, this is unintelligible rambling. ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: RIP Helio Gracie
    ... Id argue that Helio shouldnt get ripped for often pointing out kimura ... I dont recall challenging you, i know there ws guys here i was gonna ... reposnding to the coupkle posts i read of you that day, ... rma many years ago and dtayed to kock tapes, ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: The King - and Junior Brown
    ... I dont agree with Everything Esker says ... But I will Admit Lonnie & Most Posters here ... That's a great way to live in real life, but this group is not about ... to read and who's posts you don't want to read. ...
    (rec.music.country.western)
  • Re: to Deev on islam
    ... > Islam without any insults, you used to insult their mothers and ... forgeten your own posts so dont go around trying to do the same childish crap you always have.. ... > years, then shut the fuck up, listen and argue like a human being ...
    (soc.culture.iranian)