Re: Is this matrix diagonalizable?
- From: "Mike Terry" <news.dead.person.stones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 02:13:01 +0100
"Tonico" <Tonicopm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1191173057.471885.171310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 30, 7:10 pm, "Carl R." <solrac...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
Let A = [1 3 1 2 ]
[0 -1 1 3]
[0 0 2 5]
[0 0 0 -2]
So I found that we have two repeated eigenvalues, namely lambda = 2.
Therefore among the 4 eigenvectors there are two eigenvectors which
have the same value, hence they can't
be linearly independent because a vector is a multiple of itself.
Therefore A is not diagonalizable. Is this correct?
Is there another way to see it?
Thanks in advance
********************************************************
The matrix is given in ujpper triangular form, and thus its
eigenvalues are the elements on its main diagonal, namely -1, 1, -2, 2
==> four different eigenvectors, one for each eigenvalue, will be lin.
indep0endent and thus will conmform a basis of the vector space ==>
the matrix is diagonalizable.
I don't know why you think there're "repeated eigenvalues"....
...and if there were repeated eigenvalues, this would not imply the matrix
was not diagonalisable..
Mike.
Regards
Tonio
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is this matrix diagonalizable?
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Is this matrix diagonalizable?
- Prev by Date: Re: PROVE sqrt(2)+sqrt(3) is a irrational number!!!
- Next by Date: Re: PROVE sqrt(2)+sqrt(3) is a irrational number!!!
- Previous by thread: PROVE sqrt(2)+sqrt(3) is a irrational number!!!
- Next by thread: Re: Is this matrix diagonalizable?
- Index(es):