Re: Two results of set geometry
- From: William Hughes <wpihughes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:13:50 -0700
On Oct 4, 11:41 am, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since you do not have a definitionfor the number of elements in N, your opinion is irrelevant.
- William Hughes
You can call it aleph_0 if you want,
You do not have a definition for
aleph_0. So this is just another way of
saying "I do not have a definition for the
number of elements in N".
- William Hughes
.
- Prev by Date: Re: A paradox in Godels incompleteness theorem that invalidates it
- Next by Date: Linear Independence
- Previous by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Next by thread: Re: Two results of set geometry
- Index(es):
