Re: Two results of set geometry

Tony Orlow wrote:
If each is the last plus 1, then the nth is n, and there cannot be n of
them without n being in the set. That's basic logic. No non-logical (ala
Ross) axioms required. It's pre-axiomatic, and therefore has precedence.

I see at least three axioms being used there. Do you?

Hint: What does "n plus 1" mean?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Two results of set geometry
    ... No non-logical (ala ... Ross) axioms required. ... It's pre-axiomatic, and therefore has precedence. ... Hint: What does "n plus 1" mean? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... non-zero integer, but there does not exist a smallest positive ... "Finlayson Numbers" known to anyone except Ross himself? ... My understanding, looking at each of these axioms, is that they apply to ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... >> Ross A. Finlayson said: ... >> Tony Orlow wrote: ... >> rules of standard mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: An uncountable countable set
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... expressing things in terms of time is natural and indicated. ... so on ad infinitum, so that one never reaches point B. ... Tell the story, Ross. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics
    ... > Ross A. Finlayson said: ... >> Tony Orlow wrote: ... >>> Sounds like a pair of iotas to me! ... naturals is integrable and equal to two. ...
    (sci.math)