Re: 'local' metric space
- From: José Carlos Santos <jcsantos@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:36:45 +0100
On 07-10-2007 16:38, sanchopancho80@xxxxxx wrote:
let X be a topological space, such that every point has got an openNo. The long line is a connected local metric space, but is not
neighbourhood, which is a metric space (perhaps one might call this a
'local metric space', the topology on X is not necessarily induced by
one of the metrics).
Is it true that if X is connected, then X is a metric space in
general?
metrizable.
oh yes, that's right. Does anything like this appear in the
literature? I haven't found anything about 'local metric spaces'.
But you will find a lot about "locally metrizable spaces". See, among
many other examples, M. R. Koushesh's article "On one-point metrizable
extensions of locally compact metrizable spaces", which was published
this year at Topology and Applications (vol. 154, no. 3, 698-721).
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'local' metric space
- From: sanchopancho80
- Re: 'local' metric space
- From: sanchopancho80
- Re: 'local' metric space
- References:
- 'local' metric space
- From: sanchopancho80
- Re: 'local' metric space
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: 'local' metric space
- From: sanchopancho80
- 'local' metric space
- Prev by Date: Re: hagman has the balls to admit it ; the thing is ...
- Next by Date: Re: ranges of integer polynomials : did i miss a thread ??
- Previous by thread: Re: 'local' metric space
- Next by thread: Re: 'local' metric space
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|