Re: when is a billion not a billion
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:52:51 GMT
In article <1192004377.568000.101340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> =?iso-8859-1?B?U2XhbiBPJ0xlYXRobPNiaGFpcg==?= <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 9 Oct, 19:20, Michael Press <rub...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:....
In 1893 the pound avoirdupois and the yard were
officially defined in terms of the kilogram and the
metre, not by act of Congress, but by order of the
Superintendent of Weights and Measures,
T.C. Mendenhall, with the approval of the
Secretary of the Treasury.
I was aware of that but, over here at least, it had no noticeable
effect on day to day life.
If overhere means something like the UK, you are right. The above
official definition was only valid in the US. The UK maintained
their old-style definition until (if I remember right) 1969.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: when is a billion not a billion
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: when is a billion not a billion
- References:
- Re: when is a billion not a billion
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: when is a billion not a billion
- From: Michael Press
- Re: when is a billion not a billion
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: when is a billion not a billion
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Empty nonsense
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Logic and paradox
- Previous by thread: Re: when is a billion not a billion
- Next by thread: Re: when is a billion not a billion
- Index(es):