Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC



On Oct 12, 12:45 pm, Han.deBru...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

The existence of urelements could make all of my
set theory invalid, admittedly. But I think they
are _not_ a part of ZFC. Am I wrong?

ZFC may have different variants: We can have a variant in which there
are urelements and a variant in which it is undetermined whether there
are urelements, but the usual treatment is that there are no
urelements.

MoeBlee


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantors definition of set
    ... thinking of a variant of ZFC with urelements here; no proper classes.) ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Implementable Set Theory and Consistency of ZFC
    ... ZFC may have different variants: We can have a variant in which there ... are urelements and a variant in which it is undetermined whether there ... My implementable set theory is the one without ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantors definition of set
    ... thinking of a variant of ZFC with urelements here; no proper classes.) ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Is bijection valid for infinite sets?
    ... even sets can be members of sets. ... Note, in ZFC: If x is a set, then is a set too. ... In set theory 2 is set. ... BUT we also MAY allow for so called "urelements", ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is bijection valid for infinite sets?
    ... even sets can be members of sets. ... Note, in ZFC: If x is a set, then is a set too. ... In set theory 2 is set. ... BUT we also MAY allow for so called "urelements", ...
    (sci.math)